<< Hide Menu
Jeanne Stansak
dylan_black_2025
Jeanne Stansak
dylan_black_2025
Absolute advantage is the ability of a country, individual, or business to produce a higher quantity of a good or use fewer resources. This is usually the easiest to point out. For example, if the United States produces 100 wheat, but Canada produces 150, then Canada has an absolute advantage in wheat. Similarly, if it takes the United States 5 hours to produce 10 computers and takes Canada 10 hours to produce 10 computers, then the US has an absolute advantage in computers.
Comparative advantage, on the other hand, refers to the ability of a country, individual, or business to produce a good or service at a lower opportunity cost than its competitors. In the context of international trade, comparative advantage refers to the opportunity cost of producing a good or service in terms of the next best alternative. A country can have an absolute advantage but not a comparative advantage. This is because even if you can make more of one good than another country, that might come at higher costs.
For example, a country with a comparative advantage in wheat production may be able to produce wheat more efficiently than other countries, even if it has a lower level of technology or a less skilled workforce. This is because the opportunity cost of producing wheat in that country may be lower than the opportunity cost of producing wheat in other countries. In other words, the country may be able to produce wheat at a lower cost in terms of the opportunity cost of the next best alternative.
When countries have a comparative advantage, they can choose to specialize. This means they stop production of one good to maximize production of the other. To get the other good, they trade with a country with a comparative advantage in a different good.
Trade is the exchange of goods and services between countries, individuals, or businesses. It allows for specialization in the production of goods and services in which they have a comparative advantage and to exchange them for other goods and services that they may not be able to produce as efficiently. This leads to increased efficiency and higher levels of production and consumption. Most economists agree that free trade boosts overall welfare.
In summary, absolute advantage refers to the ability to produce more of a good (or use fewer resources when doing so), while comparative advantage refers to the ability to produce a good or service at a lower opportunity cost than competitors. Trade allows countries, individuals, and businesses to specialize in the production of goods and services in which they have a comparative advantage and to exchange them for other goods and services. This leads to increased efficiency and higher levels of production and consumption. Understanding these concepts is essential for analyzing the benefits and costs of trade and for making informed decisions about how to allocate resources.
AP Economics exams are rife with comparative advantage questions since they test your understanding of opportunity cost.
There are two types of problems within these concepts:
The rules for these problems are:
The per unit opportunity cost for 1 unit of steel in Canada is 1/2 unit of coal (500/1000)
The per unit opportunity cost for 1 unit of steel in Japan is 1/4 unit of coal (300/1200)
Since 1/4 is less than 1/2, Japan has the comparative advantage in steel.
The per unit opportunity cost for 1 unit of coal in Canada is 2 units of steel (1000/500)
The per unit of opportunity cost for 1 unit of coal in Japan is 4 units of steel (1200/300)
Since 2 is less than 4, Canada has the comparative advantage in coal.
Therefore, Japan will export steel to Canada and import coal from Canada. Note that a country cannot have a comparative advantage in both goods.
Terms of trade are determined by looking at the two opportunity costs and choosing a number that falls between the opportunity costs in order for it to be beneficial to both countries.
Acceptable terms of trade for this situation would be:
The rules for these problems are:
Using the table, we would determine that Brazil has an absolute advantage in the production of cars (2 hours < 3 hours). Brazil also has an absolute advantage in the production of trucks (2 hours < 6 hours).
The per unit opportunity cost for 1 car in the United States is 1/2 a truck (3 divided by 6).
The per unit opportunity cost for 1 car in Brazil is 1 truck (2 divided by 2).
Since 1/2 is less than 1, the United States has a comparative advantage in the production of cars.
The per unit opportunity cost for 1 truck in the United States is 2 cars (6 divided by 3).
The per unit opportunity cost for 1 truck in Brazil is 1 car (2 divided by 2).
Since 1 is less than 2, Brazil has comparative advantage in the production of trucks.
Therefore, the United States will export cars to Brazil and import trucks from Brazil.
Terms of trade are determined by looking at the two opportunity costs and choosing a number that falls between the opportunity costs in order for it to be beneficial to both countries.
Acceptable terms of trade for this situation would be:
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.