<< Hide Menu
7 min read•june 18, 2024
Sumi Vora
Sumi Vora
Oftentimes, music will switch between keys. If the music retains a secondary key for a relatively long time, then that is called modulation. However, if the music only retains the secondary key for a couple of phrases, that is called tonicization. In either scenario, a secondary note will act as the tonic. And, as follows, there will be a secondary note that acts as the dominant, i.e., the secondary dominant.
You can only tonicize major or minor triads–not diminished or augmented triads. That means that in a major key, vii° cannot be tonicized, and in a minor key, ii° cannot be tonicized. In written music, it is easy to identify tonicization when there are accidentals.
It is most common to tonicize to the dominant, the subdominant, or the supertonic (V, IV, ii) of the primary key. For example, in A major, the secondary key would be the dominant–E major–so the secondary dominant would be the dominant of E major–B major. So, if you're looking at a piece in A major and you see II chords popping up, then you may want to consider the idea that you are looking at a secondary dominant.
If you're in a secondary key, then you will notate chords in that secondary key. From the previous example, instead of writing the B major chord as a II chord, you will write it as a V/V chord (i.e., the chord/the scale degree of the "second" chord).
Ex: Let's look at an example. Here is an excerpt from the 2nd movement of Beethoven's Piano Sonata no. 10 in C major
Looking at beat 3, we see that there are accidentals (C#) and that the VI chord resolves to a ii. Since A is the dominant of D, it is likely that the VI⁷ chord is actually a V⁷/ii chord. So, measure 17 actually looks like: V⁷ - I - V⁷/ii - ii
You'll notice that this progression makes more sense musically. We usually don't see VI⁷ chords in music, and the V⁷-I-V⁷-I progression shows a pattern that we wouldn't have noticed before.
Practice: Try measure 18 and then check your answers with the image below:
Note: you can't have a V/IV chord in major; you can only have a V⁷/IV. This is because a V/IV would be a I chord.
In AP music theory, it is very unlikely that you will see chords that are just...out of place. Here are some questions to ask yourself:
Secondary chords follow the same voice leading and doubling rules as any other chord progression. Usually, secondary dominant chords will be written in 1st inversion so that the #4 is on the bottom. A IV-V⁶₅/V-V progression is common because it establishes the bassline 4-#4-5, and a chromatic bassline sounds cool. Additionally, if you see the #4-5 progression, then you can assume that it is a V/V-V progression of some sort.
There is one exception to voice-leading rules for secondary dominants. When you are tonicizing, you will have a new temporary leading tone. Instead of resolving up, that temporary leading tone can resolve down to become the seventh of the next chord.
You can insert a secondary dominant anywhere in the middle of a chord progression. Let's say that you have a chord progression I-iii-vi-ii-V-I and you wanted to put a secondary dominant before the vi. Then, you would just have I-iii-V/vi-vi-ii-V-I. You can also chain secondary dominants, e.g., I-iii=V/vi-V/ii-V/V-V-I.
Let's look at an example, a past exam question from 2018.
Let's quickly fill in the first three beats of measure 1. If you need help with voice-leading, check out these guides.
That will resolve to ii, which is A-C-E-G. Notice the chromatic bassline: G-G#-A.
Example: Write vii०/IV, vii०⁷/IV, and viiø⁷/IV in B major.
In B major, the root of the IV chord is E, so our new tonic is E. That means that our new leading tone is D#. So, vii०/IV is D#-F#-A♮, vii०⁷/IV is D#-F#-A♮-C♮, and viiø⁷/IV is D#-F#-A♮-C#.
In measure 2, we have something interesting. On beat 1, we have a ii०⁶₅ chord (F-Ab-D-C), and on beat 2, we have F#-A-C-E, which is a diminished 7th chord. Since there are accidentals, we know that we might be dealing with a secondary leading-tone chord. F# is the leading tone for G, which is V of C, so we can write the chord in beat two as vii०⁷/V.
Why didn't we analyze beat one as a secondary leading tone? The notes on beat one are F-Ab-D-C, which means that the secondary leading tone would be in an inversion: we would write it as a 6-5 chord. And, since D is the leading tone of E, we could write it as a vii०⁶₅/iii. However, there are two problems with this. First, we usually don't see secondary leading tone chords in inversions because it erases the dominant function of the chord. Second, musical context is important. If this were a tonicization, we would expect it to resolve to a iii triad. However, we "change key" again in beat 2 of the measure. That means that the chord doesn't serve a function as a chord in a secondary key, so we wouldn't analyze it as such.
Finally, in measure 3, we see another V⁷ chord, which makes sense musically because a vii०⁷/V is resolving to a V⁷. The last beat is another passing 6-4 chord.
There are a few extra considerations to keep in mind when part-writing with secondary leading tone chords.
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.